How To Find Out The "Psychopaths" In The Office

Emotional manipulation is a hot topic in the workplace. It is popular to a large number of books on the market to explore it, the degree of depth is far from being covered by a single article. But one thing is for sure: nine of the most difficult conversations you face in the workplace are due to people playing emotional manipulation.

Emotional manipulation at work often causes many people to suffer. The most serious ones are morale, employee involvement, productivity and customer satisfaction. So solving the problem of bluffing is as important as solving other thorny issues. In any case, as long as you or anyone feels that they are being coerced or humiliated at work, they can not be accepted.

It is important to learn to distinguish two kinds of bluff. No matter what workplace, there are two kinds of emotional manipulators: one is malicious (the so-called snake in a suit); the other is not malicious (once victimized survivors). Almost all of them will do anything to achieve their goals. They are the black sheep of the work and will endanger the people around them. But these two kinds of people are different, which means that you need to respond to them in different ways.

The first kind of bluffing person has the personality of a psychopathic person. (pay attention to the distinction between "psychopaths" and psychological diagnoses mentioned in this article), they are typical representatives of deliberate, cold blooded, unscrupulous manipulation and emotional manipulation. Dr. Robert Hare, a famous psychopathic expert, and Dr. Paul Babiak, an organization psychologist, CO authored a book called "the snake in a suit" (Snake in Suits), which describes the psychopaths in the business world. Robert Hare, Robert.

According to Haier, psychopaths show some personality traits, most notably they are totally lacking in the concept of good and evil. Psychopaths do not feel guilty or have good or evil ideas, so they do not care about the indirect harm they pursue while pursuing their personal goals. Besides, they are extremely conceited, bad tempered, and fond of pursuing excitement.

The brain of a psychopaths seems to lack the function of the frontal lobe, which is responsible for emotional processing and guilt and empathy. So psychopaths do not ask themselves: "why do I want to hurt others?" if this action is in line with their purpose, they will say, "why not?" psychopaths are usually very smart, very clear rules, and will find ways to overturn the rules. They are very careful to get rid of the way, lock the object that can be bullied, find the opportunity, and absolutely take advantage of the person or the current situation. The most troublesome part of dealing with the problem of psychopaths is that they have no sense of guilt, so even in a situation where you can hardly imagine anyone to lie, they can get out of trouble by not being angry or telling lies.

Do you have this experience: when you interact with your colleagues, bosses or your immediate supervisor, you always feel bad, and your work performance is bad. It seems that you are the one who harms you, even though you know it is not your responsibility at all. Maybe you are only responsible for a report, but at the beginning, no one told you to submit the report. Or you assign someone a task to someone, and you repeatedly promise that you will handle it well, and finally find that the job is not done at all. And somehow you start to believe that the result is not good, but it's all yours, even if it has nothing to do with you. What's more, the real responsible person persuaded others that he or she was the victim of the whole thing. If you have ever encountered such a thing, you may encounter a psychopath.

It's not easy. According to the estimate, there is one in every one hundred people. The higher your position is, the higher the proportion you will encounter. We agree with the proposal of Haier and barbiac that they want us to be careful about mental disorders in the workplace, so we have summarized some of their suggestions here.

They are delighted to invite you to their sympathy party. Psychopaths will always ask you for forgiveness. They can move out countless reasons to explain their bad behavior or bad performance, which is purely for your sympathy and then repeat the same behavior.

Their emotions are inconsistent. For example, when a person is injured or physically injured, most people will have emotional reactions, but they do not have any emotional reactions. Or else they are. emotion It was totally out of line with the situation at that time, for example, when someone was in trouble, they laughed.

Their behavior is like a parasite. Psychopaths lose their jobs to others. They feel cool beside themselves, but at last they take others' credit to themselves. If they make a mistake, they will shirk their responsibilities.

Their deceptive tactics are superb. They are good at telling lies, but they are smart enough to add a little truth to their lies, so that they can justify themselves.

• if they are conscious of their own charisma, they will be generous. When they realize that personal charisma can help themselves achieve their goals, they will be skillfully deployed in the office, and then you will know who is a psychopath. But as long as they are no longer of use value, they will quickly remove them from their friends list.

They are very arrogant. Psychopaths Never mind flattering yourself in words -- there are quite a few of them.

They prevarication responsibility 。 They never consider themselves wrong, and they will find evidence to prove that it is someone else's fault.

They are very adventurous. You will not see these people repeating some boring jobs. They often get around in the company, and they are using unreliable methods to get the world.

They like to pursue power. Psychopaths seem to be eager to get ahead, but what they care about is the rank, not the chance to bring positive weather to the company or contribute to the company.

This list is a good start, but we should remind you that any features or actions described here are not enough to be regarded as proof that you meet psychopath. Even if you know who is in line with one or two of them, it does not mean that they are psychopaths. Recommendations are best left to experts for diagnosis. However, there is a way to help you calculate the number of psychopathic behaviors. If you find that more and more behaviors are consistent with this list, you must be very careful. For example, a direct officer may have told you face to face that it is their job to cooperate with the big clients. But then you found that the client was not in charge, and the direct officer simply said that they did cooperate with their clients in their homework (lying), but the other side was not very reliable; or they assigned the job to another person in the team to deal with, but the man did not act according to the requirements. And psychopaths do not usually stop here. They may move out some evidence that can not be proved, mixed with a little truth in it, for example, they remember having talked with a colleague and asked him how much he could help to deal with the customer's follow-up work. When it comes to such matters, their attitude is unexpectedly calm, but things are already very serious.

To put it simply, this experience makes you feel as if you are trapped in a bunch of vague words, strange behaviors and contradictory reactions. The performance of the other person seems completely irrelevant, even if this is a serious matter for the company's business.