Increasing Work Without Pay Raises Responsibility For Losses.

Originally, he was only responsible for the work of the janitor, but he was arranged for concurrent work. The result was that the important letter of the boss was lost, and now he was faced with the punishment of being dismissed.

Recently, Mr. Wu has come to visit him. He has to remember and comment on the fairness of the company.

According to Mr. Wu, 5 years ago, he entered a private enterprise as a doorman. At that time, the labor contract stated that the post was the doorman and the wage was carried out according to the minimum wage in the city.

He cherished his work because he was over five and had no qualifications and skills.

He is conscientious in his post, and the daily patrols and personnel registration are handled according to the regulations, and he dare not slack off.

Although his colleagues have changed several rounds, he still works here.

One day, the boss proposed to return an outside employee who handled letters and sent letters. After that, letters and couriers were not allowed to be sent to the office.

Although you have opinions, you still have to obey your job.

In this way, his workload increased, sending at least two to three letters a day, especially the urgent express, and running more.

Xiao Bai collar company's express delivery is still very busy. He will be sent to his office when he is too busy.

Originally thought that such a hard work, the boss will add a little more wages, who knows wages did not add, before the Spring Festival because of the loss of a courier letter, his job will soon be unprotected.

On that day, he was called to his office by his boss. He said that a very important delivery letter was missing a few days ago. He had inquired of the courier company and said that he had signed it, but his handwriting was blurred.

Later, enquiries on duty records found that Mr. Wu was on duty that day, so the boss thought that this was Mr. Wu's negligence, resulting in the loss of express.

Mr Wu felt wronged that he distributed letters in name by name. How could he miss them? But the boss did not listen to his explanation. He said he was wrong and did not apologize. He would be dismissed.

Under this circumstance, Mr. Wu was in a hurry and did not know what to do.

Shanghai red three rights law firm Yuan Yongbin

The punishment of enterprises is unfair.

First, the principle of fairness is not taken into account. Generally speaking, the primary duty of the doorman is security, but in some enterprises, the gatekeeper is not only a guard, but also a switchboard, consulting, sending and receiving, and even cleaning work.

These security guards, who have several jobs, are generally only clear about the duties of security work, and these new supplementary jobs are often not included.

That is to say, it is proper to do well. If we do not do well, we must punish.

Two, increase workload and do not take the principle of equal consultation.

Because a lot of work has been increased, so that the "under the eaves" doorman worried that the work is difficult to find and dare not pick up. In other words, the unit has used its strong position so that workers have to pay more and less income.

The three is the insufficient basis for punishment.

What's wrong with the letter's loss?

Similarly,

Is there such a rule that a letter is dismissal immediately?

Yuan suggested that employers should be impartial in their punishment. From the principle of equivalence of rights and obligations, the workload should be measured scientifically, the division of work should be considered, the health of workers should be considered, and the weak position of workers could not be imposed.

If the employee accepted the new job, it should also be included in the examination, that is, the completion of the error free, the bonus should be counted.

In this way, workers can be convinced.

For employees, once the newly added tasks of the unit are done, they can not be neglected because they do not increase their income.

If we are not competent, we must make clear that once we have done it, we must do well.

In particular, it should be known that although such changes are not written in writing, once you have done so, it is legally agreed that the two sides have reached an agreement.