Document Writing: Three Questions About Writing Survey Report

First, how to write a good proposal for the investigation report?

An article

Two, how to deal with the relationship between many people's investigation and writing reports?

This is a question of relationship between groups and individuals.

There is a big difference between official document writing and literary creation.

Literary creation is entirely individual labor and manual labor.

If Ba Jin and Guo Moruo combine to write a novel, they promise not to look good, because each person has his own style.

But official documents represent the collective will of a leading organ, so it is a manifestation of collective will.

The investigation is often not a person to investigate, there is a survey team, so the survey report should be a reflection of the will of the group.

There are also surveys of one person, but in most cases it is a multi person survey.

Personally, I believe that the investigation team should preferably be about three people, not too many, few and refined, so as to facilitate the attention of everyone.

Some large and medium-sized comprehensive surveys can be more numerous, but at last, we should write a report on sub topics, add a comprehensive overview in front, or make a summary of the contents of the whole report.

I want to make a summary of the long report, otherwise the leader will not have time to read it.

A few hundred words can highlight the essence of the investigation report, especially the countermeasures and suggestions.

When there are differences, we can fully discuss and allow reservations to be marked out by two of the plan and three of the plan, so that we can achieve the goal of seeking common ground while reserving differences.

The difference of investigation should be made by the leader of the investigation team. When the group leader clash with the leader, he can still insist on the name of the investigation team, because the investigation report reflects the will of the investigator rather than the leader's will.

When the leader thinks it is wrong, he can write it clearly in his comments and report it again.

In this way, democracy has been developed without damaging the following initiatives.

Therefore, we must deal with the relationship between the whole and the individual, fully respect the opinions of the individual, and finally follow the democratic centralism and the ruling of the group leader, so that we can get a more objective opinion.

Three. How to solve the problem of duplication of questions and suggestions in the survey report?

The investigation report should be in a state of affairs, discussed and managed.

I think the situation can not be complicated. It is very concise to make people feel moved.

Part of the problem needs to be detailed and unfolded, and we must try to put it deeply, because investigation is aimed at finding problems and solving problems.

Part of the countermeasures and suggestions should be concise and 1234.

For example, with "grasping castration" as an example, there are problems such as fighting for cattle, fighting for water and fighting agricultural machinery after the production of household products. There are problems such as fighting and fighting in some places. In the countermeasures and suggestions, we can propose such a method as castration. This method is not contradictory to our so-called scientific lottery and probability theory. We must emancipate our minds, solve this problem theoretically and carry out operation in practice.

In this way, the countermeasures and suggestions are very succinct.

The key to the proposal is to have a high degree, a theoretical height and a few characteristics: foresight and scientificity.